Peer Assessment and self-reflection

Peer review each of your team members’ contribution to both the team dynamics and the report proposal – 500 -1000 words, 10 marks. (I have 3 Members of group use initial name such as Mr. A, Mr. B, Mr. C)
2. Submit a written self-reflection, on their experience of working in a team over the trimester using Tuckman’s model of group dynamics as the framework – 1500- 2000 words, 20 marks.

MMM – 211

T3 2017

Assessment 3 – Peer assessment and self-reflection

 

DUE DATE AND TIME:                                    Due Week 11, February 2, 2018 by 11.59pm

PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:        30%

Learning Outcome Details

Unit Learning Outcome (ULO)	Graduate Learning Outcome (GLO)
ULO 2: Utilising existing frameworks demonstrate an understanding of and distinguish between effective and ineffective team behaviour. ULO 3: Recognise and reflect on your team and your team members participation over the trimester.	GLO6: Self management: Working and learning independently and taking responsibility for personal actions. GLO7: Teamwork: working and learning with others from different disciplines and backgrounds.

Assessment Feedback:

Students who submit their work by the due date will receive their marks and feedback on CloudDeakin following the final release of results period.

Description / Requirements

Students will:

1. Peer review each of your team members’ contribution to both the team dynamics and the report proposal – 500 -1000 words, 10 marks.
2. Submit a written self-reflection, on their experience of working in a team over the trimester using Tuckman’s model of group dynamics as the framework – 1500- 2000 words, 20 marks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

TASK:

1. This assessment requires you to complete an individual reflection that addresses your experiences of working in a team over the trimester. Using Tuckman’s model as the framework for their answer, students will reflect on their journey and the relationship with other team members using theory taught throughout the trimester to underpin their comments. Students who merely tell the story of the trimester will not pass this assignment.

We are looking for students to reflect on the good, the bad and the ordinary, using the theory taught throughout the trimester to ‘explain’ what has been happening in your team.

2. You are also asked to rate each of your team members’ contributions across ALL team activities for Modules 1-8 AND the Team Project and to also provide a paragraph or two that reflects your views on the ‘equity’ of the contributions between team members and the assignment.

 

PEER REVIEW

1. Please complete and submit the peer review table on the next page.
2. Also provide a paragraph or two that reflects your views on the ‘equity’ of the contributions between team members and the reward (assignment mark) that should be given.

Please note: Mac computers may be problematic with this table. You may need to manually fill it in and upload it.

Reviewer’s Details:

Family name	Click here to enter text.
Given name	Click here to enter text.
Student ID number	Click here to enter text.
Title of Team Project	Click here to enter text.

Instructions for peer reviewing your team members:

1. Insert name of each of your team members at the top of each column in the table below.
2. Using the drop-down menu in each criterion, rate each team member from 1 to 5.
3. Once completed for each team member, place your cursor in the blue cell at the bottom of their column in the table (‘Total Score out of 10’ cell). Manually provide a score for your team members out of 10.

Peer Review of Team Members for ALL their teamwork in this Trimester:

	Team Member one	Team Member one	Team Member one
Name and Student ID	Click here to enter text.	Click here to enter text.	Click here to enter text.
Participated in team discussions/meetings	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Helped keep team focussed on tasks	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Regularly provided useful ideas	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Met deadlines and schedules	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Contributed data on organisation’s needs, goals & strategies	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Contributed to LFA	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Contributed to project creativity and/or implementation and monitoring	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Contributed fair share to overall workload	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Quantity of work done on designated tasks	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
Quality of work done on designated task	Choose an item.	Choose an item.	Choose an item.
TOTAL SCORE OUT OF 10:	0	0	0

 

SUBMIT YOUR ASSIGNMENT in the ASSIGNMENT DROP-BOX: Submit one word document with your individual reflections, your peer review table, and your reflection on the ‘equity’ of the contributions between team members and the reward.

 

Submission Instructions

You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit, until the marked assignment has been returned to you.  In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy.

 

Any work you submit may be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of detecting collusion and/or plagiarism.

 

When you are required to submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment dropbox folder after upload, and check for, and keep, the email receipt for the submission.

Notes

• Penalties for late submission: The following marking penalties will apply if you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension: 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day up to five days, and work that is submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked. You will receive 0% for the task. ‘Day’ means working day for paper submissions and calendar day for electronic submissions. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date.
• For more information about academic misconduct, special consideration, extensions, and assessment feedback, please refer to the document Your rights and responsibilities as a student in this Unit in the first folder next to the Unit Guide of the Resources area in the CloudDeakin unit site.
• Building evidence of your experiences, skills and knowledge (Portfolio) – Building a portfolio that evidences your skills, knowledge and experience will provide you with a valuable tool to help you prepare for interviews and to showcase to potential employers. There are a number of tools that you can use to build a portfolio.  You are provided with cloud space through OneDrive, or through the Portfolio tool in the Cloud Unit Site, but you can use any storage repository system that you like. Remember that a Portfolio is YOUR tool. You should be able to store your assessment work, reflections, achievements and artefacts in YOUR Portfolio. Once you have completed this assessment piece, add it to your personal Portfolio to use and showcase your learning later, when applying for jobs, or further studies.  Curate your work by adding meaningful tags to your artefacts that describe what the artefact represents.

 

The post Peer Assessment and self-reflection appeared first on assignmentbest.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER………………………NO PLAGIARISM Get 100% Original papers from the writing experts CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS……