Skip to main content

Introductory Sociology

Introductory Sociology

Final Assignment – Research Interview Assignment

Assignment Guidelines

 

Interview someone (a friend or acquaintance, but preferably not a family member) about his or her understanding of one critical sociological concept. Then, compose a 6 – 8 page, paper describing and analyzing what this person told you based upon the ideas, concepts and facts we have covered in class.

 

The goal of this exercise is to test your understanding of one of the critical theoretical concepts presented in this course by having you analyze how someone who is not an expert on these topics understands them. Critical concepts include class, culture, race, gender and social reproduction, social change, and deviance.

 

All papers (including interview questions) are due, in class, on Friday, April 4, 2014.

 

 

Directions and Suggestions:

 

Choosing a Subject: First, you will need to find someone who will agree to talk with you about his or her attitudes about and experiences with your selected topic (e.g., class, gender, culture, race, or deviance). It doesn’t matter whether this person’s views and experiences are typical or exceptional, only that they are willing to talk with you about them. Tell them the conversation will last no more than an hour and that you will not disclose their identity in your project.

 

Preparing for the Interview: Second, you will need to prepare for the interview by figuring out what topics you want to cover and how you will get your interviewee to start talking about them. Some of the themes you might want to cover include: how they characterize their own background, how typical they think their experience is (and in relation to whom); how they think a person’s class, for example, is determined or decided, how important is race, for example, in Canada. There will probably be other topics you want to raise as well. Some of these topics may be best posed as direct questions. Others, however, might require you to be more creative.

 

Conducting the Interview: As you conduct your interview, keep two points in mind. The first is to let the exchange develop or flow as naturally as possible, as a kind of focused-conversation. Don’t worry if topics come up in a different order than you planned or if your respondent is unable or unwilling to answer some of your questions. Just try to make sure that all the points you want to cover are touched on in one way or the other. The second point is to take careful notes during the interview. If your interviewee is willing, you might even consider tape-recording it. You will need to refer back to these records during the course of writing up your analysis (especially if you use direct quotes in your writing) and have them available in case there are any later questions about your project.

 

Writing the Analysis: The final step in the process is writing up a brief description and analysis of your findings. The most important thing here is that the paper should not be just a report of what your respondent said, but rather an analysis of how your respondent understood your topic (that is, class, gender, deviance, race, or culture). Your goal, in other words, is to make some kind of an argument about your respondent’s views, comparing and contrasting them to what you have learned in class. Relevant concerns for class might include: statistics about income inequality and social mobility, different definitions of class, and concepts such as social reproduction and achievement ideology. Also, keep in mind that what your respondent didn’t discuss might be as revealing as what she or he did discuss.

 

Assessment: I will grade your essay based upon (1) the clarity of your presentation of your respondent’s views; (2) the insightfulness of your general analysis of these views, and (3) your usage of ideas and examples from class to frame and develop your argument (4) the quality of your interview questions. A detailed grading rubric is attached to the assignment and posted on Web CT.

 

Final Thoughts: Use a pseudonym (a made-up name) to protect the privacy of your interviewee. Please do not hesitate to consult with me if you have any problems or questions with this assignment.

Introductory Sociology

Assignment 2 – Research Interview

Assessment Rubric

 

 

(80 – 100%)

  • Content is well researched and contains all required information
  • Expresses and organizes ideas and information with a high degree of effectiveness
  • Uses subject specific vocabulary, and terminology with a high degree of effectiveness
  • Demonstrates a thorough knowledge and/or understanding of concept
  • Highly detailed and accurate analysis of interview findings
  • Uses appropriate and consistent academic referencing including publisher, volume
  • Variety of question types were used
  • Questions were clear, creative, logically sequenced and on-topic
  • Almost no errors in conventions (e.g., grammar spelling, punctuation)

 

(70 – 79%)

  • Content is adequately researched and contains most of the required information
  • Expresses and organizes ideas and information with considerable effectiveness
  • Uses subject specific vocabulary, and terminology with considerable effectiveness
  • Demonstrates considerable knowledge and/or understanding of concept
  • Detailed and mostly accurate analysis of interview findings
  • Usually uses appropriate academic referencing
  • Questions were clear, logically sequenced, and appropriate to the concept
  • Few minor errors in conventions (e.g., grammar spelling, punctuation)

 

(60 – 69%)

  • Content is partially researched and contains some of the required information
  • Expresses and organizes ideas and information with some effectiveness (some parts have to be reread to clarify ideas)
  • Uses subject specific vocabulary, and terminology with some effectiveness
  • Demonstrates some knowledge and/or understanding of concept
  • Somewhat detailed analysis of interview findings that may have minor errors
  • Interview questions were mostly clear, some were logically sequenced and usually appropriate
  • Attempts to cite some resources

 

(50 – 59%)

  • Content is superficially researched and contains only basic information
  • Expresses and organizes information with limited effectiveness
  • Uses subject specific vocabulary and terminology with limited effectiveness
  • Demonstrates limited knowledge and/or understanding of concept
  • Limited or incomplete analysis of interview findings
  • Interview questions were unclear, randomly sequenced and related to the topic
  • Resources are not cited

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Netanel (1996) talks about the NIEP theory approach to copyright and the democratic paradigm. Explain the difference between these in your own words. Lessig (2008) talks about read-only (RO) and read/write (RW) culture. How can copyright facilitate both of these?

chapter one Introduction A ‘‘Largely Ignored Paradox’’ The u.s. supreme court has famously labeled copyright ‘‘the engine of free expression.’’1 Copyright law, the Court tells us, provides a vital economic incentive for the creation and distribution of much of the literature, commentary, music, art, and film that makes up our public discourse. Yet copyright also burdens speech. We often copy or build upon another’s words, images, or music to convey our own ideas effectively. We cannot do that if a copyright holder withholds permission or insists upon a license fee that is beyond our means. And copyright does not extend merely to literal copying. It can also prevent parodying, remolding, critically dissecting, or incorporating portions of existing expression into a new, independently created work. Consider The Wind Done Gone, a recent, best-selling novel by African American writer Alice Randall. Randall’s novel revisits the setting and characters of Margaret Mitchell’s classic Civil War
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain why HAMILTON is considered “a cultural monument?”

  Module 7: Theatre Now: Steps Toward Diversity Chapter Questions Read Chapter 9 “Musicals of the Twenty-First Century” (pages 244 to 246) and Chapter 10 (pages 247 to 260) in your textbook. Choose only 5 of these questions to answer. Write your answers in your own words; if you choose to quote from the textbook, remember to identify the source. Question # Chapter Questions 1 9 Explain how Broadway musicals have changed in the 21st century. 2 9 Explain why HAMILTON is considered “a cultural monument?” 3 10 Identify the current focus/topics of the American theatre’s social awareness. 4 10 Give an example of how current theatre is addressing inequality in each of these areas: (a) gender and sexuality (b) racism (c) access to theatre for people with disabilities 5 10 How has theatre moved from its pre-1960s attitude that plays must not be open about the Love that dare not speak its name? [This expression was first used by Lord Alfred Douglas in his 1894 poem, “Two Loves” written in refere
Post a Comment
Read more

CBS Undercover Boss website

  Go to the CBS   Undercover Boss   website and search for a full episode of the show. Imagine you are the CEO of the company in the selected episode.  please do this with 2 pages Provide a detailed comparison of two job positions from the episode. Perform a job analysis of each position. Provide a clear, detailed description of your method of collecting the information for the job analysis. Examples include one-on-one, interview, or survey. Create a detailed job description from the two positions you analyzed. Provide clear, conclusive rationale for why the job analyses and job descriptions comply with state and federal regulations. Support your propositions, assertions, arguments, or conclusions with at least three credible, relevant, and appropriate sources synthesized in a coherent analysis. Cite each source on your source list at least once within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citation, access the  library  or review  library guides . Write clearly and conc
Post a Comment
Read more