Skip to main content

effective verbal, written, and technological communication using legal and ethical standards for transferring knowledge.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to allow the learner to demonstrate effective strategies for evaluation of credible scholarly websites.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

  1. Demonstrate effective verbal, written, and technological communication using legal and ethical standards for transferring knowledge.
  2. Use leadership strategies that promote quality nursing practice and increase collaboration with other disciplines when planning comprehensive care for individuals and groups.

4. Integrate critical thinking and judgment in professional decision-making in collaboration with faculty and peers.

6. Relate application of the legal and ethical requirements of nursing laws and standards to interactions with faculty, peers, and others.

9. Demonstrates responsibility for personal and professional development by assessing computer competence, implementing plans for upgrading computer skills, and using effective strategies for online student success.

 

 

Directions and Grading Criteria

Category

Points

%

Description: See Grading Rubric for Details
General Information

15 points

10%

 Clearly state the following regarding the selected website: search engine used to locate website and URL of homepage of selected website. URL must link to homepage when copied or clicked.
Authority

25 points

16.66%

 Clearly describe the reasons this website would be considered a reliable resource for information on the topic. Include the contact information (group name, address, and phone number).
Information

40 points

26.67%

 Clearly describe information presented on the website, including all of the main headings of the site. Describe accuracy and thoroughness of information and how you made this determination.
Objectivity

25 points

16.67%

 Clearly explain how content does or does not represent bias based on advertising and sponsorship.
Ease of Navigation

15 points

10%

 Discuss the ease of use of this website for healthcare professionals and for lay persons. Differentiate ease of navigation for each group.
Usefulness

30 points

20%

 Clearly describe how useful the information on this website is for healthcare professionals and for lay persons. Differentiate between the usefulness for each group.

Total

150 points

 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria A:(92–100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance

 B:(84–91%)

Very good or high level of performance

 C:(76–83%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

 F:(0–75%)

Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
General Information

15 points

 Clearly states the following regarding the selected website: search engine used to locate website and URL of homepage of selected website. URL must link to homepage when copied or clicked.

 

(14–15 points)

 Name of search engine or URL may be unclear or incorrect.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12–13 points)

 Name of search engine or URL may be unclear or incorrect. URL may not link to homepage of website when clicked or copied.

 

 

 

 

(11 points)

 Search engine and/or URL not provided.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0–10points)
Authority

25 points

 Clearly describes the reasons this website would be considered a reliable resource for information on the topic. Includes the contact information (group name, address, and phone number).

 

(23–25 points)

 Statement regarding reliability of source needs additional clarity. Contact information is provided, but one area may be incorrect or missing.

 

 

 

 

(21–22 points)

 Statement regarding reliability of source is unclear or incomplete. OR more than one part of contact information is incorrect or missing.

 

 

 

 

(19–20points)

 No statement of reliability OR some or all of contact information is missing or incorrect.

 

 

 

 

 

(0–18 points)
Information

40 points

 Clearly describesinformation presented on the website, including all of the main headings of the site. Describes accuracy and thoroughness of information and how this determination was made.

 

(37–40 points)

 Describesinformation presented on the website, including most of the main headings of the site. Describes accuracy and thoroughness of information, but lacks clarity regarding how this determination was made.

 

(33–36 points)

 Information description is unclear or incomplete. May or may not describe accuracy and thoroughness of information or how this was determined.

 

 

(30–32points)

 Part or all of requirements are missing or poorly presented.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0–29 points)
Objectivity

25 points

 Clearly explains how content does or does not represent bias based on advertising and sponsorship.

 

 

 

(23–25 points)

 Statements regarding objectivity and/or bias need additional clarity. Advertising and sponsorship are considered.

 

 

(21–22 points)

 Statements regarding objectivity and/or bias are unclear or incomplete. Advertising and sponsorship may or may not be considered.

 

(19–20points)

 Part or all of requirements are missing or poorly presented.

 

 

 

 

(0–18 points)
Ease of Navigation

15 points

 Discusses the ease of use of this website for healthcare professionals and for lay persons. Differentiates the ease of navigation for each of these two groups.

 

(14–15 points)

 Discussion of ease of use needs additional clarity. Professional use and lay person use may or may not be differentiated.

 

 

 

(12–13 points)

 Discussion of ease of use is unclear or incomplete. Professional use and lay person use may or may not be included or differentiated.

 

(11 points)

 Part or all of requirements are missing or poorly presented.

 

 

 

 

(0–10 points)
Usefulness

30 points

 Clearly describes how useful the information on this website is for healthcare professionals and for lay persons. Clearly differentiates usefulness for each of these two groups.

 

(27–30 points)

 Description of usefulness needs additional clarity. Differentiates use for professionals versus lay persons.

 

 

 

 

(25–26 points)

 Description of usefulness is unclear or incomplete. Differentiation of use for professionals and lay persons lacks detail.

 

 

(23–24 points)

 Part or all of requirements are missing or poorly presented.

 

 

 

 

 

(0–22 points)

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

1. Good time management for project managers includes initiating contact with key stakeholders only when there is a valid issue to deal with. -True -False

1. Good time management for project managers includes initiating contact with key stakeholders only when there is a valid issue to deal with. -True -False Click here for more on this paper ……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted 2. A project manager should identify a problem in terms of its alternate solutions so that team members can more easily reach a decision on how to solve the problem. -True -False 3. Networks are mutually beneficial alliances that are generally Click here for more on this paper ……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted governed by the law of: a Supply-demand b Brooks’s law c Reciprocity d A squeaky wheel e Risk-reward Click here for more on this paper ……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted 4...
Post a Comment
Read more

How did life in the British colonies contribute to creating a unique American identity?

How did life in the British colonies contribute to creating a unique American identity? How do you see that identity manifested in modern American society? 200 to 300 words Click here for more on this paper ……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted Assignment status :  Solved by our Writing Team at EssayCabinet.com. MAKE YOUR ORDER
Post a Comment
Read more

Netanel (1996) talks about the NIEP theory approach to copyright and the democratic paradigm. Explain the difference between these in your own words. Lessig (2008) talks about read-only (RO) and read/write (RW) culture. How can copyright facilitate both of these?

chapter one Introduction A ‘‘Largely Ignored Paradox’’ The u.s. supreme court has famously labeled copyright ‘‘the engine of free expression.’’1 Copyright law, the Court tells us, provides a vital economic incentive for the creation and distribution of much of the literature, commentary, music, art, and film that makes up our public discourse. Yet copyright also burdens speech. We often copy or build upon another’s words, images, or music to convey our own ideas effectively. We cannot do that if a copyright holder withholds permission or insists upon a license fee that is beyond our means. And copyright does not extend merely to literal copying. It can also prevent parodying, remolding, critically dissecting, or incorporating portions of existing expression into a new, independently created work. Consider The Wind Done Gone, a recent, best-selling novel by African American writer Alice Randall. Randall’s novel revisits the setting and characters of Margaret Mitchell’s classic Civil War...
Post a Comment
Read more